The debate of divergent ideas consumes the airwaves. It streams across the Internet in a multitude of bits and bytes; and it populates the pages of the print media. Most important, it occupies the time, energy, and resources of our leaders.

So how is the debate working so far? Are you seeing results?

In a corporate environment, a short period of debate would lead to a decision and action. You take your chances with bad decision or the poor execution of a good decision. But, the persistent failure to reach a decision and execute a plan of action is guaranteed to create paralysis and eventual lack of relevance in the market place.

Democracy is much messier. Our system of government is designed to protect the voice of the minority. The paralysis that would kill a company is an accepted – and occasionally celebrated – part of life in our form of government.

So why can’t our elected leaders reach consensus on a course of action? They are, for the most part, bright people. They have seemingly substantial resources at their disposal to study alternatives and craft a solution.

 The absence of respect – for the process, the opposition, and the people being governed – is a prime culprit in our failure to act and deliver results.

 Look up the word respect in the dictionary and you will see the following:

to hold in esteem or honor: to show regard or consideration for: to relate or have reference to.

When is the last time you saw true respect in the debate over the course of action to resolve any of the challenges we face?

You will hear the word, but it is rare to see it in action. Respect is often mentioned as a qualifier for disagreement such as “With all due respect to my colleague across the aisle.”

 Here’s the thing – if you have to qualify your comments with language about respect then there is a good chance you don’t really respect the other person.

Public courtesy and politeness are not respect. If respect was truly part of the leadership DNA we would see the following from those in the majority and the minority:

  • Not playing procedural games with the process to push their agenda.
  • Valuing differences in opinion and perspective and actively looking for opportunities to reach a workable solution for everyone rather than dismissing any alternative that might anger the electoral base.
  • Taking the obligation to serve so seriously that you embrace opportunities to listen to voices that do not share your views.

Great Leaders and Great Companies Get It

 There are still numerous examples of leaders and organizations who view the topics of diversity and inclusiveness as an affirmative action tool to avoid litigation.

But, the best companies have learned that true respect – not simply civility and courtesy – is a strategic advantage. It enables teams to function at their highest levels. It creates an environment where different opinions are valued and ideas are evaluated on their merits. Vigorous, respectful debate is valued, and no one hides the truth.

Great leaders know that respect is crucial to gaining and sustaining the commitment of followers and cooperation of colleagues. Respect is a requirement for open dialog to resolve differences and solve problems.

 Respect is earned by our performance not bestowed by a position. We receive it when others come to know and trust our:

  • Strength of character
  • Depth of competence
  • Clarity of communication
  • Consistency of commitment
  • Constancy of courage

 The debate of divergent ideas will only be resolved when leaders model true respect. Until then, tune in for the entertainment, but don’t hold your breath for results.